scoreboard showing 1,314 days since the UK’s vote to leave the European
Union the chances of another failure to deliver seem vanishingly small.
And so just 3 more days remain for our country as a member. That in
itself will be a first time situation for many British people. But then
the 20’s seem set to be a decade of change in many ways.
at the top we have a monarch who has served for 67 years and will reach
her 100 years in 2026 while her consort the Duke of Edinburgh will
reach that milestone sooner – in 2021. A fact of human life is that it
is finite – and so we must face the possibility that the 2020’s will be
the last decade of the New Elizabethan era. So while Harry makes the headlines today it is the future of the monarchy that will come into question before too long.
the children of the 1940’s baby boom will reach their 80’s over the
next ten years and fade away in greater numbers than ever before. A
statistical fact used by pro-EU vote losers as a crutch to promote
rejoining after another vote. Sadly for them this will never occur as
both economic factors and bigger world issues will take priority over
political manoeuvres in Europe.
the biggest world issue will be climate change – along with the actions
we are required to take in response. But that needs a separate posting
after a month’s absence we find that the British political map has been
redrawn. Now many of the changes were widely predicted – or at least
hoped for – but perhaps few thought that so many would be realised so
Labour Party were shown to have fallen for their own spin that the
traditionally industrial regions would always vote for them no matter
how little notice had been taken of their opinions. In the real world
seats like Bolsover were full of voters fed up with the Islington
doctrines. One typical result being that Dennis Skinner was ousted after
49 years of being the MP for this rock-solid labour constituency.
many of those MPs that had pushed their own agendas, rather than serve
the people that they were elected to represent, got what they deserved.
They wont be amongst those being sworn in to the new parliament next
the Brexit Party failed to get any of their candidates past the post in
first place. This is not what many had hoped for – yet their effect on
the result was far greater than either Labour or Conservative supporters
– and the BBC – would admit.
our own constituency. The Conservative vote was up by less than 1.5% yet
the well-liked sitting Labour candidate had a vote fall-off of almost
18%. Why? Because the Brexit Party took almost 14% of the vote. Not
enough to do better than third overall but enough to sink Labour. So
much for people who voted to leave the EU in 2016 having changed their
mind, having died off or having been replaced by more intelligent first time Labour / Remain voters.
What next? A Conservative government with 162 more MPs than a leaderless Labour opposition certainly changes the game plan – especially after replacing dissident Conservative MPs with loyal party supporters and getting a new Speaker. Changes that should remove many of the obstacles to progress. And ones that will have already been noted by our European partners.
treaty with the EU is far from ideal – or even being desirable – but in
practice the WTO option for leaving looks as dead as remaining. So
neither side of the EU membership debate actually gets a clear victory.
The outcome is coloured neither blue nor red but a muddy brown shade of
It’s 4 pm so nominations for candidates in next month’s general election have closed.
after a short delay a full list of potential members of parliament for
all 650 seats should be available to the voters. A list that should be
notable if only because of the number of changes since the last national
vote. Even without all the schemes for tactical voting – ie voting for
someone you don’t like so has to disadvantage someone you like even less
or just not fielding a candidate – there were around seventy seats
where the previous MP is not standing.
that there are also seats where the previous MP is standing but has
changed allegiance the total number of new MPs must be approaching a
hundred. And that does not allow for the fact that the Labour Party has
switched from – at best – neutral to firmly pro-EU. A move that that
will change voting patterns that have been in place for decades in some
the political turmoil of the past few years the 2019 result is going to
be hard to predict – but it is quite possible that Friday the 13th will
see the no end to the unrest …
November and the UK’s position with the European Union remains
unchanged. Despite all the promises we are still paying the EU vast
amounts so that they can spend our taxes on themselves and their pet
schemes in Europe and on aid around the world.
Now the mythical
leaving date has been moved to the end of January 2020. This gives the
politicians just thirteen weeks to complete their scrutiny and implement
some form of exit plan.
the first six of these weeks will be spent campaigning in a general
election. Then at least the next three will be spent getting the new
parliament in place and taking a Christmas-New Year break. Then no more
than four weeks will remain for the new balance of power to take control
and finalise a plan.
Of course the numbers are critical in determining how these four weeks progress – if at all. The so-called Liberal Democrats (George Orwell’s fictional NewSpeak
becomes fact!) intend to revoke our request to leave if they get the
chance. And there are constituencies that voted to remain in 2016 where
today’s voters think that this is acceptable practice. With a number of
MPs switching their allegiance the party could gain seats – but perhaps
not enough to have another female Prime Minister just yet [sorry Jo]
the Marx Brothers – and Sisters – say they will delay leaving yet again
so that they can negotiate a better leaving deal and then campaign to
remain through a second referendum. One that excludes the option to
leave as a free agent under world trade terms. Considering that many Grandads
from outside of Greater London who voted to leave in 2016 are also
traditional Labour voters this approach seems doomed from day one. The
only question is how many seats will Labour loose?
At the Shrine of the Dead Donkey the Conservative position is let’s back the May-Robbins-Johnson deal and move on. This policy could be good enough to convince enough voters and so add enough seats for a new government to have a working majority. Its major weakness is that it leaves the country shackled to our friends in Europe. And that man Barnier is already lined-up to extract the maximum punishment in the trade talks still to come. Given the time and effort spent to get to the current position – and what has happened with other trade deals – we could be suffering at the hands of the EU for many more years.
we have the party that highlighted the problems created when widely
divergent nations are tied to a common bureaucracy. In this election the
Brexit Party will suffer from being seen as a one issue party – and
from the Conservatives reluctance to spell out what their deal really
means. The voting public are smart enough to treat Euro elections
differently to domestic ones. So the TBP will not gain as many seats as
they did earlier this year. However they have the possibility of gaining
some and these could be critical in influencing the outcome of those
four weeks in January.
all depends on how well the implications – and shortcomings – of the
current deal can be explained. And if the new parliament reverses the
no-deal block that was imposed by political scaremongers in the last
Time to book some holidays away from all of this …
should, according to previous promises by our Prime Minster, be the
country’s last as a member of the European Union.
even though there are six remaining days for things to change, it seems
almost certain that leaving at the end of October will become another
promise that is broken.
the lack of a majority in parliament has left the country with a
government that is unable to govern. With an array of anti-exit
political factions and vested interests against it any meaningful
progress has become impossible – even the judiciary showed their bias.
Of course, for the many Grandads
happy to support leaving without the far-reaching constraints demanded
by the EU, this situation means that a bad deal has also been delayed –
so far. But with many politicians demanding that No-Deal is taken off the table the chances of the UK actually escaping the spider’s web of EU control next week seem slim.
giving up on the present parliament and having a general election does
offer a potential solution. But only if it results in a clear majority
of MPs being in one camp or the other. Recent experience shows that
another minority government could be the result – and then we are back
in the same situation by Christmas.
public’s view of our pseudo-democratic representatives must now have
fallen to an all-time low – with plenty of justification.
surprise move a group of MPs – also ones opposed to leaving the European
Union – have presented a case to the Royal and Ancient High Court of
Lindisfarne to amend the calendar through a decree that October can no
longer have 31 days.
A move that will end the existence the 31st of October in perpetuity – and to compensate will add an extra day to November.
members involved stated that this was a long disputed issue that
seriously disadvantages millions of British people no longer able to
remember the rhyme about the number of days in each month. This was now
seriously impacting the mental health of the nation and was costing the
NHS millions. They are, therefore, demanding that the speaker of the
house makes an order for the immediate acceptance of their Calendar
Correction Bill – as soon as the court issue their verdict. This is
expected by Wednesday at the latest.
These same members also stated that this urgent action is totally unrelated to any other matters that parliament is currently considering or in any way linked to blocking the UK from leaving the EU. To quote Our only interest being protecting the well being of the nation.
Update: Today the Lord Provost of the Lindisfarne Court announced
that the case had been rejected and gave a summary of the grounds for
its rejection. These were that the plaintiffs did not attend the court
in person as required, that no victims of the supposed injustice were
presented and that the High Court’s jurisdiction on such issues had been
terminated by Act of Parliament in 1648.
As predicted last week, the new deal with the EU revealed today – and immediately accepted by Brussels – is the May-Robbins dead donkey treaty with some tweaks for the Irish issue but now with a divorce bill reduced to just £33,000 million! So it seems our all-new prime minister is actually Theresa May 2.0 underneath.
If that is not the case then a Baldrick-style cunning plan could be in play – based on a guess that our self-serving politicians will defeat the dead donkey
for a fourth time on Saturday – and then a hope that the EU would loose
their patience and say no to another extension. Thus exiting without a
deal on 31-Oct-2019. But that seems like another flying pig scenario!
the other political parties the latest deal has already been rejected as
a step backwards and provided them with more fuel for revoking our
Article 50 leave request; probably via a one-sided referendum. A
view that might now just win out. If it does then the only bright spot
would be a general election to follow with an opportunity to vote in a
Brexit parliament that would invoke Article 50 again – if the EU had not
blocked countries using that route by then.
That tangled web is entrapping us more and more …
bookies are rethinking their odds that there will be a UK-EU deal agreed
as soon as next week. Clearly someone thinks that a deal is near.
while all the anti-no deal politicians ought to be happy at the
expected news it is more likely that they will live to regret their
Because the only deal the EU have ever supported is their one-sided
treaty agreed to by the May-Robins gang. A treaty that even these same
anti-no deal politicians rejected no less than three times. This is the
only deal that is ready-to-go – and one already approved by the 27 EU
could be wrong and a complete replacement for the 600+ page treaty
might be created in time to be approved next week. But pigs might fly.
So what about a few quick edits on the existing treaty? Well the only
edits so far covered relate to the Irish land border. Nothing else has
been aired in public.
logical implication is that the original treaty – the dead-donkey deal –
will be tweaked for the Irish issue and then put to the UK parliament
for a fourth time.
And, as before, if approved it will commit the country to a much despised Brexit-in-name-only future. A Pyrrhic victory
that leaves the UK with the worst of no-deal and worst of remain
without any advantages. And a general election will punish the culprits
but come too late to undo the mess.
Oh! What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
political wrangling reaches fever-pitch the mood amongst the general
population seems to range from despair to barely contained anger.
can so many of our elected representatives be so bad? Many – most –
ignore their constituents’ choices and play juvenile games in an
insulated metro bubble with zero regard for the well being of the
least the EU politburo is working towards an objective with a plan –
even though it is flawed plan to create a European Empire ruled by a
central cabal. Whereas every UK plan seems to be to try anything and
hope we can all muddle through. All the time expecting that everyone
involved will play the game with fairness and honesty. An ideal that
cuts little ice in the 21st century.
The next few weeks are supposed to be our last under EU control .. but we have all heard that so often before.
it is now 1,200 days since the EU membership referendum result and that
was preceeded by months if not years of pro- and anti- arguments you
would think that every possible issue had been covered.
no. Instead we have shrieks and wails from anti-Brexit factions
demanding months more of delays. For what? To discuss? To have a rigged
referendum? To have a damaged general election? Or simply to remain-
either by these repeated delays or by revoking our leave request?
Looking at our politicians – and judges – from outside of the metropolitan bubble gives Grandads little insight into their off-camera activities. But experience tells us that most are driven by self interest – be that personal, financial or idealogical. So we cannot see who is getting paid or benefiting from insider trading or who is trying to weaken or even break-up our country. But there can be little doubt that they exist.
outside of the UK we have little support from powerful EU figures –
unlike leaders in Australia and the United States for example. And the
typical EU view is that we are there to be exploited and restricted in
any way possible. Their words deny it – but their actions do not.
The country has to leave – and today would not be too soon!